首页> 外文OA文献 >Differences in research funding for women scientists: a systematic comparison of UK investments in global infectious disease research during 1997-2010
【2h】

Differences in research funding for women scientists: a systematic comparison of UK investments in global infectious disease research during 1997-2010

机译:女科学家研究经费的差异:1997 - 2010年英国对全球传染病研究投资的系统比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: There has not previously been a systematic comparison of awards for research funding in infectious diseases by sex. We investigated funding awards to UK institutions for all infectious disease research from 1997 to 2010, across disease categories and along the research and development continuum.Design: Systematic comparison.Methods: Data were obtained from several sources for awards from the period 1997 to 2010 and each study assigned to—disease categories; type of science (preclinical, phases I–III trials, product development, implementation research); categories of funding organisation. Fold differences and statistical analysis were used to compare total investment, study numbers, mean grant and median grant between men and women.Results: 6052 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising 4357 grants (72%) awarded to men and 1695 grants (28%) awarded to women, totalling £2.274 billion. Of this, men received £1.786 billion (78.5%) and women £488 million (21.5%). The median value of award was greater for men (£179?389; IQR £59?146–£371?977) than women (£125?556; IQR £30?982–£261?834). Awards were greater for male principal investigators (PIs) across all infectious disease systems, excepting neurological infections and sexually transmitted infections. The proportion of total funding awarded to women ranged from 14.3% in 1998 to 26.8% in 2009 (mean 21.4%), and was lowest for preclinical research at 18.2% (£285.5 million of £1.573 billion) and highest for operational research at 30.9% (£151.4 million of £489.7 million).Conclusions: There are consistent differences in funding received by men and women PIs: women have fewer funded studies and receive less funding in absolute and in relative terms; the median funding awarded to women is lower across most infectious disease areas, by funder, and type of science. These differences remain broadly unchanged over the 14-year study period.
机译:目标:以前没有按性别对传染病研究经费的奖励进行系统的比较。我们调查了1997年至2010年期间针对所有传染病研究,在疾病类别和研究与开发连续过程中向英国机构提供的资助拨款设计:系统比较方法:从1997年至2010年期间从多个资助来源获得的数据分配给疾病类别的每项研究;科学类型(临床前,I–III期试验,产品开发,实施研究);资金组织类别。倍数差异和统计分析用于比较男女的总投资,研究数量,平均赠款和中位数赠款。结果:最终分析中包括6052项研究,其中男性获赠4357笔(占72%),男性获赠1695笔( 28%)授予女性,总计22.74亿英镑。其中,男性获得17.86亿英镑(78.5%),女性获得4.88亿英镑(21.5%)。奖励的中位数是男性(179?389英镑; IQR 59?146英镑–371?977英镑)高于女性(125?556英镑; IQR 30?982英镑?261?834英镑)。除神经系统感染和性传播感染外,所有传染病系统中的男性主要研究者(PI)所获得的奖励都更高。妇女获得的总资助比例从1998年的14.3%到2009年的26.8%(平均21.4%)不等,临床前研究最低,为18.2%(15.73亿英镑中的2.855亿英镑),运营研究最高,为30.9%。百分比(4.897亿英镑中的1.514亿英镑)。结论:男性和女性PI接受的资金始终存在差异:女性获得的研究资金较少,绝对和相对资金也较少;根据资助者和科学类型,在大多数传染病地区,授予女性的资金中位数较低。在14年的研究期内,这些差异大致保持不变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号